[zanog-discuss] Poor Internet manners - Psychz Networks

Siyuan Miao siyuan at misaka.io
Wed May 26 09:35:09 SAST 2021


What's the issue here?

Are their routes announced to RS unreachable or your routes announced to RS
are unreachable from their side?

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:25 PM Mark Tinka via zanog-discuss <
zanog-discuss at lists.nog.net.za> wrote:

>
>
> On 5/26/21 08:59, Ron B via zanog-discuss wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> These guys https://www.peeringdb.com/net/6747 are on the route reflectors
> at NAP and INX.
>
>
> <pedantry>
> Route servers. Route reflectors are for iBGP :-).
> </pendatry>
>
>
> However, they don’t honour their routes.  There are then complaints
> because clients cannot get to IPs on their network.
>
> It is stupid to traffic engineer every ASN that behaves badly.  I have
> logged a ticket with their NOC and they refuse to assist as I’m not a
> client.
>
> So can these blokes be forced off the router reflectors by the IX admins
> and told to do private peering instead?   Alternatively, does anyone know
> someone there that can be pinged to clean up their act?
>
>
> You could just totally filter anything from/to them, if I understand the
> kinds of levers NAPAfrica and INX-ZA provide, non?
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> zanog-discuss mailing list
> zanog-discuss at lists.nog.net.za
> http://lists.nog.net.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zanog-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nog.net.za/cgi-bin/mailman/private/zanog-discuss/attachments/20210526/99a21a7c/attachment.html>


More information about the zanog-discuss mailing list